Advocacy for German New Medicine (GNM), often referred to as “Germanische Heilkunde,” can be approached through various channels aimed at education, legislation, and integration into medical practice. Here’s how advocacy can be structured in these areas:

EDUCATION:

  1. Curriculum Development:
    • Academic Integration: Advocates could push for the inclusion of GNM concepts in medical and health science curricula. This would involve creating courses or modules that introduce the Five Biological Laws of Nature, as conceptualised by Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer, into educational programs.
  2. Public and Continuing Education:
    • Workshops and Seminars: Organising workshops, seminars, or online courses for both the public and healthcare professionals could spread awareness. These could be hosted by institutions or independent practitioners who have studied GNM.
    • Adult Education Centres: Adult education centres have been known to offer courses on alternative medicine, which could be a platform for GNM.
  3. Research and Publications:
    • Encouraging Research: with enough financial support, BLNA could fund or encourage research to examine GNM principles critically, aiming to bridge the gap between traditional medicine and GNM. Publishing findings in peer-reviewed journals could enhance credibility.

LEGISLATION:

  1. Policy Advocacy:
    • Legal Recognition: Campaigning for legal recognition or at least acknowledgment of GNM could involve lobbying for changes in health policy to include alternative medical practices under certain conditions. This would necessitate demonstrating that GNM does not harm patients and might offer benefits when used alongside conventional treatments.
  2. Insurance Coverage:
    • Reimbursement Policies: Advocating for insurance coverage or partial reimbursement for GNM treatments could make it more accessible. This would require showing that such treatments meet certain efficacy and safety standards, which is currently a significant hurdle due to the lack of conventional medical validation.
  3. Regulation of Practitioners:
    • Licensing and Standards: Proposing regulations for GNM practitioners to ensure they are trained to a certain standard could help legitimize the practice. This might include certifications or affiliations with established medical or naturopathic bodies.

MEDICAL PRACTICE:

  1. Integration into Conventional Medicine:
    • Collaborative Practices: Encouraging partnerships between GNM practitioners and conventional doctors where GNM is used as a complementary approach. This requires mutual respect and a shared understanding of patient care benefits.
  2. Professional Development:
    • Training Programs: Developing programs where medical practitioners can learn about GNM, not necessarily to practice it but to understand its principles for better patient communication and to offer a more holistic approach to care.
  3. Patient Advocacy:
    • Support Groups: Creating support groups for patients interested in GNM can foster community and provide a platform for sharing experiences, which can indirectly push for more acceptance in medical practice by showcasing potential benefits or demand.
  4. Clinical Trials:
    • Evidence Gathering: Pushing for or funding clinical trials could provide the empirical data needed to back GNM claims, though this would face scrutiny regarding methodology and ethical considerations.

Advocacy for GNM in these sectors is challenging due to its controversial status within the medical community, lack of peer-reviewed scientific support, and ethical concerns regarding patient safety when treatments are not backed by conventional medicine.

BLNA can offer a professional collective front to any member who wishes to advocate for the Biological Laws.

Scroll to Top